Newmann v. Newmann

55 A.D.2d 822, 390 N.Y.S.2d 300, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15633
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 17, 1976·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The trial court found that the plaintiff husband is entitled to a divorce upon the grounds of his wife’s cruel and inhuman treatment toward him which rendered it improper and unsafe for him to cohabit with her. We believe that the evidence before the trial court was sufficient to support its findings of fact and see no reason to disturb its conclusion granting plaintiff a [823]*823divorce, particularly where, as here, to do so would needlessly prolong the obviously defunct marriage (Hessen v Hessen, 33 NY2d 406; Echevarria v Echevarria, 40 NY2d 262). (Appeal from judgment of Niagara Supreme Court—divorce.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Cardamone, Mahoney, Dillon and Goldman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newmann v. Newmann, 55 A.D.2d 822, 390 N.Y.S.2d 300, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15633 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

55 A.D.2d 822 (Newmann v. Newmann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Breckinridge v. Breckinridge
103 A.D.2d 900 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Underwood v. Underwood
55 A.D.2d 1016 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)