Newmann v. Newmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Newmann v. Newmann

55 A.D.2d 822, 390 N.Y.S.2d 300, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15633

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 17, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 55 A.D.2d 822 (Newmann v. Newmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Newmann v. Newmann, 55 A.D.2d 822, 390 N.Y.S.2d 300, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15633 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The trial court found that the plaintiff husband is entitled to a divorce upon the grounds of his wife’s cruel and inhuman treatment toward him which rendered it improper and unsafe for him to cohabit with her. We believe that the evidence before the trial court was sufficient to support its findings of fact and see no reason to disturb its conclusion granting plaintiff a [823]*823divorce, particularly where, as here, to do so would needlessly prolong the obviously defunct marriage (Hessen v Hessen, 33 NY2d 406; Echevarria v Echevarria, 40 NY2d 262). (Appeal from judgment of Niagara Supreme Court—divorce.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Cardamone, Mahoney, Dillon and Goldman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The trial court found that the plaintiff husband is entitled to a divorce upon the grounds of his wife’s cruel and inhuman treatment toward him which rendered it improper and unsafe for him to cohabit with her. We believe that the evidence before the trial court was sufficient to support its findings of fact and see no reason to disturb its conclusion granting plaintiff a [823]*823divorce, particularly where, as here, to do so would needlessly prolong the obviously defunct marriage (Hessen v Hessen, 33 NY2d 406; Echevarria v Echevarria, 40 NY2d 262). (Appeal from judgment of Niagara Supreme Court—divorce.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Cardamone, Mahoney, Dillon and Goldman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.2d 822, 390 N.Y.S.2d 300, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newmann-v-newmann-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack