Newman v. United States
This text of Newman v. United States (Newman v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7593
SIMON NEWMAN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:07-cv-00121-IMK-JES)
Submitted: February 25, 2009 Decided: March 11, 2009
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Simon Newman, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel W. Dickinson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Rita R. Valdrini, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Simon Newman appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing Newman’s complaint under the Federal Tort Claims Act,
28 U.S.C. §§ 2571–2680 (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Newman’s motion
to compel production of documents and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Newman v. United States, No.
1:07-cv-00121-IMK-JES (N.D. W. Va. July 22 & Aug. 13, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Newman v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newman-v-united-states-ca4-2009.