Newman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Newman v. State

1913 OK CR 235, 132 P. 1196, 9 Okla. Crim. 738, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 227

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided June 28, 1913·No. No. A-1669.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Harvey Newman, plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with the intent to sell the same, and was on the 18th day of November, 1911, sentenced - in accordance with the verdict of the jury to be confined in the county jail for thirty days and pay a fine of fifty dollars. From this judgment an appeal was attempted .to be taken by filing in this court, March 16th, 1912, a petition in error with case-made.

When the case was called for final submission the Attorney General filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that sa.id appeal was not taken within the time prescribed by the statute, in that no order was made extending the time beyond the sixty days allowed by law within which to perfect an appeal. For this reason the motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained and the "cause remanded to the county court of Washington county with direction to enforce its judgment and sentence therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Harvey Newman, plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with the intent to sell the same, and was on the 18th day of November, 1911, sentenced - in accordance with the verdict of the jury to be confined in the county jail for thirty days and pay a fine of fifty dollars. From this judgment an appeal was attempted .to be taken by filing in this court, March 16th, 1912, a petition in error with case-made.

When the case was called for final submission the Attorney General filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that sa.id appeal was not taken within the time prescribed by the statute, in that no order was made extending the time beyond the sixty days allowed by law within which to perfect an appeal. For this reason the motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained and the "cause remanded to the county court of Washington county with direction to enforce its judgment and sentence therein.

Newman v. State, 1913 OK CR 235, 132 P. 1196, 9 Okla. Crim. 738, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 227 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

1913 OK CR 235 (Newman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.