Newman v. State of California

185 F.2d 392, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3283
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 9, 1950·No. 12423·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Heretofore this court dismissed the appeal in the above entitled case upon the ground that no judgment had ever been entered in the case by a court. Thereafter *393 we denied a petition for rehearing. We now have before us another petition for a rehearing with no change in the record. Petitioner is a layman acting for himself and seems not to understand that there must be a judgment, and not merely a statement that a judgment will be made and entered, before we can entertain an appeal. If and when a judgment is entered and an appeal is properly taken we shall of course entertain and decide the appeal.

Cause was ordered dismissed August 22, 1950.

Rehearing was denied October 2, 1950.

Rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newman v. State of California, 185 F.2d 392, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3283 (9th Cir. 1950).

185 F.2d 392 (Newman v. State of California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. State of Arizona
206 F.2d 159 (Ninth Circuit, 1953)
Newman v. State of California
184 F.2d 515 (Ninth Circuit, 1950)