Newman v. State
351 S.W.3d 273, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1449, 2011 WL 5137771
This text of 351 S.W.3d 273 (Newman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Newman v. State, 351 S.W.3d 273, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1449, 2011 WL 5137771 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
Opinion
ORDER
Michael Newman appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. Newman claims that the motion court clearly erred because he received ineffective assistance of counsel in that his trial counsel failed to cross examine the victim adequately. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cadwell v. State
351 S.W.3d 273 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
351 S.W.3d 273, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1449, 2011 WL 5137771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newman-v-state-moctapp-2011.