Newman v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Newman v. State

120 S.E. 38, 31 Ga. App. 113, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 759

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 13, 1923

Docket14785

StatusPublished

This text of 120 S.E. 38 (Newman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Newman v. State, 120 S.E. 38, 31 Ga. App. 113, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 759 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was indicted in two counts, for the offense of forgery and for the offense of knowingly littering a forged instrument, and was convicted of the latter offense. The evidence authorized the verdict, and, under all the particular facts of the case, no reversible error was committed upon the .trial. The overruling of the motion for a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was indicted in two counts, for the offense of forgery and for the offense of knowingly littering a forged instrument, and was convicted of the latter offense. The evidence authorized the verdict, and, under all the particular facts of the case, no reversible error was committed upon the .trial. The overruling of the motion for a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 S.E. 38, 31 Ga. App. 113, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newman-v-state-gactapp-1923.