Newman v. State

77 So. 3d 844, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 175, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 150
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 11, 2012·No. No. 4D10-3599·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Davis v. State, 69 So.3d 315 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); Flores v. State, 57 So.3d 218 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); Fomst v. State, 988 So.2d 38 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); State v. Oakley, 715 So.2d 956 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

TAYLOR, HAZOURI and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newman v. State, 77 So. 3d 844, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 175, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 150 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

77 So. 3d 844 (Newman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Oakley
715 So. 2d 956 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Forrest v. State
988 So. 2d 38 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Davis v. State
69 So. 3d 315 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Flores v. State
57 So. 3d 218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Hernandez v. State
61 So. 3d 1144 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)