Newman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Newman v. State

656 So. 2d 269, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6633, 1995 WL 366393

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Newman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 610 So. 2d 455 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 21, 1995·No. No. 94-3058·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence but remand for correction of the score-sheet, which improperly scored two points for possession of marijuana under 20 grams, an offense that was nolle prossed by the state, as an additional offense at conviction. As removal of the two points does not affect [270]*270the guidelines recommended range, resen-tencing is not required.

GLICKSTEIN, STONE and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence but remand for correction of the score-sheet, which improperly scored two points for possession of marijuana under 20 grams, an offense that was nolle prossed by the state, as an additional offense at conviction. As removal of the two points does not affect [270]*270the guidelines recommended range, resen-tencing is not required.

GLICKSTEIN, STONE and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Newman v. State, 656 So. 2d 269, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6633, 1995 WL 366393 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

656 So. 2d 269 (Newman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.