Newman v. State
566 So. 2d 372, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6791, 1990 WL 129682
This text of 566 So. 2d 372 (Newman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Newman v. State, 566 So. 2d 372, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6791, 1990 WL 129682 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
Opinion
We hold that appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief as originally filed adequately specifies the facts supporting the motion, as Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 requires. We reverse the trial court’s order denying the amended motion, and remand for consideration of the motion on its merits.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
566 So. 2d 372, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6791, 1990 WL 129682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newman-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.