Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Newman v. State

Newman v. State

566 So. 2d 372, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6791, 1990 WL 129682
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Newman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 575 So. 2d 724 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 12, 1990·No. No. 89-2508·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We hold that appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief as originally filed adequately specifies the facts supporting the motion, as Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 requires. We reverse the trial court’s order denying the amended motion, and remand for consideration of the motion on its merits.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

HERSEY, C.J., and STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newman v. State, 566 So. 2d 372, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6791, 1990 WL 129682 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

566 So. 2d 372 (Newman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.