Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Newman v. State

Newman v. State

476 So. 2d 775, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2359, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16275
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 16, 1985
DocketNo. 85-671
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 476 So. 2d 775 (Newman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Newman v. State, 476 So. 2d 775, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2359, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16275 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully reviewed the transcripts of the deposition and motion to suppress in this case, and it is clear to us that the investigating trooper first smelled marijuana in the subject vehicle while standing outside the vehicle — without any intrusion — and also smelled it subsequently when his head intruded into the vehicle. Accordingly, we conclude that the motion to suppress was properly denied; and we affirm.

HERSEY, C.J., and DOWNEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Reeves
488 So. 2d 670 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
State v. Bennett
481 So. 2d 971 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
476 So. 2d 775, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2359, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newman-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.