Newman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Newman v. State

409 So. 2d 514, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19221

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 10, 1982

DocketNo. 81-344

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 409 So. 2d 514 (Newman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Newman v. State, 409 So. 2d 514, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19221 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., Judge.

Appellant was convicted of uttering a false or forged instrument. He was sentenced to five years on the condition that the sentence “be served consecutively with any other sentence imposed by any other court.” Construing this language as referring only to a sentence already imposed at the time the court entered its judgment, we AFFIRM. See Teffeteller v. State, 396 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, C. J., and COWART, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., Judge.

Appellant was convicted of uttering a false or forged instrument. He was sentenced to five years on the condition that the sentence “be served consecutively with any other sentence imposed by any other court.” Construing this language as referring only to a sentence already imposed at the time the court entered its judgment, we AFFIRM. See Teffeteller v. State, 396 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, C. J., and COWART, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

409 So. 2d 514, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newman-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack