Newman v. State
409 So. 2d 514, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19221
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 10, 1982·No. No. 81-344·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of uttering a false or forged instrument. He was sentenced to five years on the condition that the sentence “be served consecutively with any other sentence imposed by any other court.” Construing this language as referring only to a sentence already imposed at the time the court entered its judgment, we AFFIRM. See Teffeteller v. State, 396 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Newman v. State, 409 So. 2d 514, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19221 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
409 So. 2d 514 (Newman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Snell v. State
438 So. 2d 1038 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Richardson v. State
432 So. 2d 750 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Louisville Title Ins. Co. v. Guerard
409 So. 2d 514 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)