Newman v. State
371 So. 2d 718, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15256
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Newman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19221 →
Opinion
Affirmed. On consideration of the briefs, record and argument of counsel, we find no reversible error. Yost v. State, 243 So.2d 469 (Fla.3d DCA 1971); De la Cova v. State, 355 So.2d 1227 (Fla.3d DCA 1978); Williams v. State, 353 So.2d 588 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); Mack v. State, 346 So.2d 1229 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); Jefferson v. State, 298 So.2d 465 (Fla.3d DCA 1974).
Accordingly, the conviction is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Newman v. State, 371 So. 2d 718, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15256 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).
371 So. 2d 718 (Newman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. State
353 So. 2d 588 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Yost v. State
243 So. 2d 469 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
De La Cova v. State
355 So. 2d 1227 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Jefferson v. State
298 So. 2d 465 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
MacK v. State
346 So. 2d 1229 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)