Newman v. State
This text of Newman v. State (Newman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
MARSAAN L. NEWMAN, § § Defendant Below, § No. 46, 2018 Appellant, § § Court Below—Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID No. 1202018751 (N) § Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: August 15, 2018 Decided: September 17, 2018
Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices.
ORDER
After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the appellee’s
motion to affirm, and the record below, we conclude that the December 19, 2017
Superior Court order summarily dismissing the appellant’s second motion for
postconviction relief should be affirmed. The Superior Court did not err in
concluding that the motion was procedurally barred and did not satisfy the pleading
requirements of Superior Court Criminal Rule 61(d)(2).
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that motion to affirm is GRANTED
and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Newman v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newman-v-state-del-2018.