Newman v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Newman v. State

127 So. 924, 23 Ala. App. 661

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided April 15, 1930·No. 4 Div. 604.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The indictment charged this appellant with the offense of violating the state prohibition laws. No jury halving been demanded, she was tried by the court, was duly convicted, and sentenced to hard labor for the county. From the judgment of conviction, she appealed, and rests her appeal upon the record proper. The record is regular and without semblance of error. The judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The indictment charged this appellant with the offense of violating the state prohibition laws. No jury halving been demanded, she was tried by the court, was duly convicted, and sentenced to hard labor for the county. From the judgment of conviction, she appealed, and rests her appeal upon the record proper. The record is regular and without semblance of error. The judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Newman v. State, 127 So. 924, 23 Ala. App. 661 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

127 So. 924 (Newman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.