Newman v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Newman v. State

127 So. 924, 23 Ala. App. 661

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 15, 1930

Docket4 Div. 604.

StatusPublished

This text of 127 So. 924 (Newman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Newman v. State, 127 So. 924, 23 Ala. App. 661 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The indictment charged this appellant with the offense of violating the state prohibition laws. No jury halving been demanded, she was tried by the court, was duly convicted, and sentenced to hard labor for the county. From the judgment of conviction, she appealed, and rests her appeal upon the record proper. The record is regular and without semblance of error. The judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The indictment charged this appellant with the offense of violating the state prohibition laws. No jury halving been demanded, she was tried by the court, was duly convicted, and sentenced to hard labor for the county. From the judgment of conviction, she appealed, and rests her appeal upon the record proper. The record is regular and without semblance of error. The judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 So. 924, 23 Ala. App. 661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newman-v-state-alactapp-1930.