Newman v. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Newman v. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co.

201 A.D. 861

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1922·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order dismissing complaint reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that the complaint, liberally construed in the interests of substantial justice, would admit evidence that the defendant was engaged in the performance of a maritime contract, viz., the repair of a steamship, and that, therefore, the Workmen’s Compensation Law did not enter into the contract of employment of the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order dismissing complaint reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that the complaint, liberally construed in the interests of substantial justice, would admit evidence that the defendant was engaged in the performance of a maritime contract, viz., the repair of a steamship, and that, therefore, the Workmen’s Compensation Law did not enter into the contract of employment of the plaintiff.

Newman v. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co., 201 A.D. 861 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

201 A.D. 861 (Newman v. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related