Newman v. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co.
This text of 201 A.D. 861 (Newman v. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order dismissing complaint reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that the complaint, liberally construed in the interests of substantial justice, would admit evidence that the defendant was engaged in the performance of a maritime contract, viz., the repair of a steamship, and that, therefore, the Workmen’s Compensation Law did not enter into the contract of employment of the plaintiff.
See 117 Misc. Rep. 426; Code Civ. Proc. § 519; now Civ. Prac. Act, § 275.— [Rep.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
201 A.D. 861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newman-v-robins-dry-dock-repair-co-nyappdiv-1922.