Newman v. Old Glory Real Estate Corp.

89 A.D.3d 599, 932 N.Y.2d 904
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 22, 2011·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Defendant established that “[it] did not receive personal notice of the summons in time to defend and has a meritorious defense” (CFLR 317; see Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v A.C. Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 NY2d 138, 141-142 [1986]). The record shows that process was served on the Secretary of State and sent to the wrong address. However, there is no evidence that defendant engaged in a deliberate attempt to avoid notice (see id. at 143; Raiola v 1944 Holding, 1 AD3d 296 [2003]). The record shows prima facie that defendant was the decedent’s employer when she was injured, which, if proven, would limit plaintiffs recovery to workers’ compensation. Concur — Tom, J.E, Saxe, Sweeny, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2010 NY Slip Op 30937(U).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newman v. Old Glory Real Estate Corp., 89 A.D.3d 599, 932 N.Y.2d 904 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

89 A.D.3d 599 (Newman v. Old Glory Real Estate Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reside Capital Partners, LLC v. Clar
2024 NY Slip Op 03637 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)