Newman v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Newman v. New York City Transit Authority

7 A.D.2d 628, 179 N.Y.S.2d 151, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4390

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 5, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 7 A.D.2d 628 (Newman v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Newman v. New York City Transit Authority, 7 A.D.2d 628, 179 N.Y.S.2d 151, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4390 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting plaintiff an examination before trial of defendant, Transit Authority, as to its rules and regulations, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondent. In permitting the examination, we do not pass on the admissibility of the rules and regulations in evidence at the trial. All we hold is that under the pleadings, as they now stand, it cannot be said that the applicable rules and regulations (which are not before us) would be inadmissible. Consequently, plaintiff should be allowed to examine as to their existence or contents. Concur —- Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Frank, Valente and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting plaintiff an examination before trial of defendant, Transit Authority, as to its rules and regulations, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondent. In permitting the examination, we do not pass on the admissibility of the rules and regulations in evidence at the trial. All we hold is that under the pleadings, as they now stand, it cannot be said that the applicable rules and regulations (which are not before us) would be inadmissible. Consequently, plaintiff should be allowed to examine as to their existence or contents. Concur —- Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Frank, Valente and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A.D.2d 628, 179 N.Y.S.2d 151, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newman-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-1958.