Newman v. Interborough Rapid Transit Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Newman v. Interborough Rapid Transit Corp.

243 A.D. 744

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1935

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 243 A.D. 744 (Newman v. Interborough Rapid Transit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Newman v. Interborough Rapid Transit Corp., 243 A.D. 744 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are of opinion that the plaintiff failed to establish any negligence on the part of the defendant (Putnam v. Broadway & Seventh Avenue Railroad Co., 55 N. Y. 108) and that the complaint was properly dismissed upon the merits. (See opinion in Kagan v. Avallone, 243 App. Div. 437.)

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Present-Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We are of opinion that the plaintiff failed to establish any negligence on the part of the defendant (Putnam v. Broadway & Seventh Avenue Railroad Co., 55 N. Y. 108) and that the complaint was properly dismissed upon the merits. (See opinion in Kagan v. Avallone, 243 App. Div. 437.)

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Present-Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newman-v-interborough-rapid-transit-corp-nyappdiv-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack