Newman v. Interborough Rapid Transit Corp.
243 A.D. 744
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We are of opinion that the plaintiff failed to establish any negligence on the part of the defendant (Putnam v. Broadway & Seventh Avenue Railroad Co., 55 N. Y. 108) and that the complaint was properly dismissed upon the merits. (See opinion in Kagan v. Avallone, 243 App. Div. 437.)
The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.
Present-Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Newman v. Interborough Rapid Transit Corp., 243 A.D. 744 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).
243 A.D. 744 (Newman v. Interborough Rapid Transit Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hart v. Hercules Theatre Corp.
258 A.D. 537 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)