Newman v. Home Life Insurance Company
122 S.E.2d 701, 255 N.C. 722, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 674
Opinion
The group policy was a contract between the insurance company and the employer. The plaintiff was a third party beneficiary. Her right against the insurance company terminated at the end of the grace period by reason of the failure on the part of her *723 employer to keep the contract alive by paying the required premium. Although the plaintiff paid her employer, who defaulted, her recourse is not against the insurance company.
The judgment of the superior court is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Newman v. Home Life Insurance Company, 122 S.E.2d 701, 255 N.C. 722, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 674 (N.C. 1961).
122 S.E.2d 701 (Newman v. Home Life Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Alabama v. Thornton
325 So. 2d 187 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1975)
Couch v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co.
216 So. 2d 72 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Boger v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
130 S.E.2d 64 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)