Newman v. Globus

129 Misc. 302, 221 N.Y.S. 181, 1927 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 701
New York Supreme Court·Decided April 8, 1927·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event, on the ground that it was error to exclude testimony by the defendants as to the terms of the loan made by decedent after the executrix herself had testified to defendants’ transaction with the decedent.

All concur; present, Bijub, Lydon and Levy, JJ. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newman v. Globus, 129 Misc. 302, 221 N.Y.S. 181, 1927 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 701 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1927).

129 Misc. 302 (Newman v. Globus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Muffling
154 Misc. 300 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1935)