Newman v. Fischer
Opinion
In an action in malpractice to recover damages against respondent, a dentist, for alleged negligence in treatment of appellant, order vacating appellant’s notice of examination before trial affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The appellant, on the motion to vacate, failed to show that the testimony was either material or necessary to prove the allegations of negligence contained in the complaint, and, further, the proposed examination calls for testimony to which, in our opinion, it is questionable whether the plaintiff is entitled. Young, Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
249 A.D. 637 (Newman v. Fischer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.