Newman v. Fischer

249 A.D. 637, 291 N.Y.S. 80, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5335
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 16, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 249 A.D. 637 (Newman v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Newman v. Fischer, 249 A.D. 637, 291 N.Y.S. 80, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5335 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

In an action in malpractice to recover damages against respondent, a dentist, for alleged negligence in treatment of appellant, order vacating appellant’s notice of examination before trial affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The appellant, on the motion to vacate, failed to show that the testimony was either material or necessary to prove the allegations of negligence contained in the complaint, and, further, the proposed examination calls for testimony to which, in our opinion, it is questionable whether the plaintiff is entitled. Young, Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McLaughlin v. McLaughlin
207 Misc. 700 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)
Sandler v. Hemlock Estates, Inc.
201 Misc. 429 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 A.D. 637, 291 N.Y.S. 80, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newman-v-fischer-nyappdiv-1936.