Newman v. City of Jacksonville

582 So. 2d 82, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6166, 1991 WL 111366
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 19, 1991
DocketNo. 89-2590
StatusPublished

This text of 582 So. 2d 82 (Newman v. City of Jacksonville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Newman v. City of Jacksonville, 582 So. 2d 82, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6166, 1991 WL 111366 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CLARIFICATION

Appellant’s motion for rehearing, filed May 1, 1991, is denied, except that the per curiam opinion filed in this case on April 16, 1991, is withdrawn and the following opinion substituted therefore.

PER CURIAM.

The grant of a new trial limited to the issue of liability is AFFIRMED. See State v. Eldridge, 565 So.2d 787 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

ZEHMER, MINER and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Eldridge
565 So. 2d 787 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
582 So. 2d 82, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6166, 1991 WL 111366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newman-v-city-of-jacksonville-fladistctapp-1991.