Newman v. Burns

112 A.D. 892

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller,"JJ., concurred; Hooker, J., dissented on the ground that there was .not sufficient' evidence to warrant the conclusion that the mortgage was a purchase-mohey mortgage.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newman v. Burns, 112 A.D. 892 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

112 A.D. 892 (Newman v. Burns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.