Newman v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.

236 A.D.2d 527, 654 N.Y.S.2d 641, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1440

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants PCM Construction, Inc., and Henkels & McCoy, Inc., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaccaro, J.), dated October 25, 1995, which denied their motion for summary judg[528]*528ment dismissing the complaint and any cross claims insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

There are issues of fact which preclude the granting of summary judgment (see, Schumacher v Richards Shear Co., 59 NY2d 239, 245; Tobin v Jesup & Lamont, 103 AD2d 845; Lirosi v Elkins, 89 AD2d 903; cf., Delgado v Matrix-Churchill Co., 205 AD2d 575).

The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newman v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 236 A.D.2d 527, 654 N.Y.S.2d 641, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1440 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

236 A.D.2d 527 (Newman v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schumacher v. Richards Shear Co.
451 N.E.2d 195 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Lirosi v. Elkins
89 A.D.2d 903 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Tobin v. Jesup & Lamont, Inc.
103 A.D.2d 845 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Delgado v. Matrix-Churchill Co.
205 A.D.2d 575 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)