Newman v. Benefit Ass'n of Railway Employees

156 S.E. 284, 42 Ga. App. 342, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 398
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 18, 1930·No. 20777·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. Where in an action upon a policy of insurance which, provides indemnity “for loss resulting, directly and exclusively of all other causes, from bodily injury sustained at any time during the life of this policy solely through external, violent, and accidental means (excluding suicide, sane or insane),” the petition alleges that “the insured met his death by drowning,” but does not allege any fact to indicate that the death was caused “solely through external, violent, and accidental means,” it does not sufficiently state a cause of action. Johnson v. Ætna Life Insurance Co., 24 Ga. App. 431 (101 S. E. 134).

2. Where in an action upon a policy of insurance which provides for the payment of a monthly premium by the insured, and that “the insurance hereunder is granted in consideration of the payment of the said monthly premium in advance,” the petition contains no allegation to indicate that the policy was maintained in force and effect by the payment of such premium or otherwise, it does not sufficiently state a cause of action.

3. The court did not err in sustaining the general demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newman v. Benefit Ass'n of Railway Employees, 156 S.E. 284, 42 Ga. App. 342, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 398 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

156 S.E. 284 (Newman v. Benefit Ass'n of Railway Employees) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Jones
56 S.E.2d 305 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Prætorians v. Cowart
177 S.E. 89 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Newman v. Benefit Ass'n of Railway Employees
162 S.E. 122 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)