Newman v. Aldredge

82 S.E.2d 823, 210 Ga. 765, 1954 Ga. LEXIS 432
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 13, 1954
Docket18630
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 82 S.E.2d 823 (Newman v. Aldredge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Newman v. Aldredge, 82 S.E.2d 823, 210 Ga. 765, 1954 Ga. LEXIS 432 (Ga. 1954).

Opinion

Candler, Justice.

The plaintiffs, alleging themselves to be citizens, taxpayers, and registered voters of Pulton County, instituted an equitable suit against the defendants, as the governing body of Pulton County, and by their petition as amended prayed that the defendants in their respective official capacity be restrained and permanently enjoined (1) from violating specified penal statutes of Georgia, and (2) from using convicts''to fill designated classified civil-service positions in the county, namely, Equipment Operators, Utility Workers, and Prison Camp Clerk. The amended petition was dismissed on general demurrer and. the exception is to that judgment. Held:

1. “Equity will take no part in the administration of the criminal law. It will neither aid criminal courts in the exercise of their jurisdiction, nor will it restrain or obstruct them.” Code § 55-102. See Moon v. Clark, 192 Ga. 47, 50 (14 S. E. 2d 481).

2. Pulton County has statutory authority to use its quota of convicts for the purpose of constructing and maintaining its system of public roads, and it may also legally use convict labor for the purpose of doing any necessary work in or about its public-works camps (Code, Title 77); and a convict when so used is not an employee of the county coming within the meaning of the words “Classified Employees” as they are defined by section 2 (7) of Fulton County’s civil-service act of 1943 (Ga. L. 1943, p. 971). Hence, the amended petition failed to state a cause of action for the relief sought, and the court did not err, as contended, in dismissing it on general demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur; Head, J., concurs in the judgment only. Robert Carpenter, Ferrin Y. Mathews, for plaintiffs in error. Harold Sheats, Ditrwood T. Pye, E. A. Wright, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hunter v. City of Atlanta
91 S.E.2d 338 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 S.E.2d 823, 210 Ga. 765, 1954 Ga. LEXIS 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newman-v-aldredge-ga-1954.