Newly Weds Foods, Inc. v. St. Louis Creamery, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Newly Weds Foods, Inc. v. St. Louis Creamery, Inc.

770 S.W.2d 749, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 760, 1989 WL 56200

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 30, 1989·No. No. 55022·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff sued defendant on an open account. Defendant filed an affirmative defense of satisfaction of any indebtedness and a counterclaim for recovery of over-payments. The jury returned a verdict for defendant on plaintiffs claim and for defendant on defendant’s counterclaim in the amount of $5,000. Plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

The “evidence in support of [the] jury verdict is not insufficient”, “no error of law appears”, and “an opinion would have no precedential value.” Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff sued defendant on an open account. Defendant filed an affirmative defense of satisfaction of any indebtedness and a counterclaim for recovery of over-payments. The jury returned a verdict for defendant on plaintiffs claim and for defendant on defendant’s counterclaim in the amount of $5,000. Plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

The “evidence in support of [the] jury verdict is not insufficient”, “no error of law appears”, and “an opinion would have no precedential value.” Rule 84.16(b).

Newly Weds Foods, Inc. v. St. Louis Creamery, Inc., 770 S.W.2d 749, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 760, 1989 WL 56200 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

770 S.W.2d 749 (Newly Weds Foods, Inc. v. St. Louis Creamery, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.