Newland v. . Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Newland v. . Moore

92 S.E. 367, 173 N.C. 728, 1917 N.C. LEXIS 398

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedMay 16, 1917

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 92 S.E. 367 (Newland v. . Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Newland v. . Moore, 92 S.E. 367, 173 N.C. 728, 1917 N.C. LEXIS 398 (N.C. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

If the ownership of the note had been put in issue it may be that the defendant would have ground of complaint as to the peremptory instruction given to the jury, but no- issue of this character is raised by the pleadings, and the defendant relies on the failure to give him notice, as indorser, of the dishonor of the note.

The note is nonnegotiable, because not payable to order or bearer, and being nonnegotiable, the defendant was not entitled to notice. Johnson v. Lassiter, 155 N. C., 50; 8 C. J., 635; 3 R. C. L., 1220.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

If the ownership of the note had been put in issue it may be that the defendant would have ground of complaint as to the peremptory instruction given to the jury, but no- issue of this character is raised by the pleadings, and the defendant relies on the failure to give him notice, as indorser, of the dishonor of the note.

The note is nonnegotiable, because not payable to order or bearer, and being nonnegotiable, the defendant was not entitled to notice. Johnson v. Lassiter, 155 N. C., 50; 8 C. J., 635; 3 R. C. L., 1220.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 S.E. 367, 173 N.C. 728, 1917 N.C. LEXIS 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newland-v-moore-nc-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack