Newland v. Curfman

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Newland v. Curfman

166 So. 2d 362, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1873

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJuly 10, 1964

DocketNo. 1196

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 166 So. 2d 362 (Newland v. Curfman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Newland v. Curfman, 166 So. 2d 362, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1873 (La. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinions

FRUGÉ, Judge.

For the reasons set forth in Phillips v. Newland, No. 1195, 166 So.2d 357, decided this date, it is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed that there be judgment herein in favor of the defendants, Hugh W. Curf-man, C. J. Palmer, and Lois B. Phillips, and against plaintiff John G. Newland, dismissing plaintiff’s suit.

In all other respects the judgment of the district court is affirmed. Plaintiff is assessed costs of this appeal.

Amended and affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FRUGÉ, Judge.

For the reasons set forth in Phillips v. Newland, No. 1195, 166 So.2d 357, decided this date, it is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed that there be judgment herein in favor of the defendants, Hugh W. Curf-man, C. J. Palmer, and Lois B. Phillips, and against plaintiff John G. Newland, dismissing plaintiff’s suit.

In all other respects the judgment of the district court is affirmed. Plaintiff is assessed costs of this appeal.

Amended and affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 So. 2d 362, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newland-v-curfman-lactapp-1964.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack