Newland v. Curfman

166 So. 2d 362, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1873
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided July 10, 1964·No. No. 1196·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

FRUGÉ, Judge.

For the reasons set forth in Phillips v. Newland, No. 1195, 166 So.2d 357, decided this date, it is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed that there be judgment herein in favor of the defendants, Hugh W. Curf-man, C. J. Palmer, and Lois B. Phillips, and against plaintiff John G. Newland, dismissing plaintiff’s suit.

In all other respects the judgment of the district court is affirmed. Plaintiff is assessed costs of this appeal.

Amended and affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newland v. Curfman, 166 So. 2d 362, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1873 (La. Ct. App. 1964).

166 So. 2d 362 (Newland v. Curfman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Phillips v. Newland
166 So. 2d 357 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1964)
Redd v. Bohannon
166 So. 2d 362 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1964)