Newkirk v. State Farm Mutual Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Newkirk v. State Farm Mutual Insurance

727 N.E.2d 592, 88 Ohio St. 3d 402

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 10, 2000

DocketNo. 99-1302

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 727 N.E.2d 592 (Newkirk v. State Farm Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Newkirk v. State Farm Mutual Insurance, 727 N.E.2d 592, 88 Ohio St. 3d 402 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinions in Wolfe v. Wolfe (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 246, 252-255, 725 N.E.2d 261, 267-269.

I do not believe that Moore v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 27, 33, 723 N.E.2d 97, 103, correctly disposes of appellant’s second proposition of law that challenges the validity of a named-driver exclusion in a contract of insurance. However, to the extent that the majority considers Moore applicable, I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in my opinion in Moore. Id., 88 Ohio St.3d 27, 33, 723 N.E.2d 97, 103.

Cook, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinions in Wolfe v. Wolfe (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 246, 252-255, 725 N.E.2d 261, 267-269.

I do not believe that Moore v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 27, 33, 723 N.E.2d 97, 103, correctly disposes of appellant’s second proposition of law that challenges the validity of a named-driver exclusion in a contract of insurance. However, to the extent that the majority considers Moore applicable, I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in my opinion in Moore. Id., 88 Ohio St.3d 27, 33, 723 N.E.2d 97, 103.

Cook, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

727 N.E.2d 592, 88 Ohio St. 3d 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newkirk-v-state-farm-mutual-insurance-ohio-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack