Newkirk v. Parker

1949 OK 158, 208 P.2d 171, 201 Okla. 583, 1949 Okla. LEXIS 370
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided July 5, 1949·No. No. 33716·Published

Opinion

CORN, J.

Plaintiff in error appealed from a judgment entered against her in the trial court, and on November 5, 1948, filed her brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendant in error has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, as stated in Osborne v. Osborne, 163 Okla. 273, 21 P. 2d 1056, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, [584]*584but the cause will be reversed and remanded, with directions.

The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the judgment entered for defendant in error and grant a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newkirk v. Parker, 1949 OK 158, 208 P.2d 171, 201 Okla. 583, 1949 Okla. LEXIS 370 (Okla. 1949).

1949 OK 158 (Newkirk v. Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Osborne v. Osborne
1933 OK 306 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1933)