Newins v. Rose
33 N.Y.S. 1131, 94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 617, 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 871
This text of 33 N.Y.S. 1131 (Newins v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Newins v. Rose, 33 N.Y.S. 1131, 94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 617, 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 871 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).
Opinion
I vote to affirm, without opinion. The testimony of Seaman that he did not sell the goods to defendant was erroneously admitted against defendant’s objection and exceptions, and was a mere statement of conclusion. He did not state what the transaction was, nor deny defendant’s statement that nothing was said between them reserving the goods plaintiffs had sold Seaman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
33 N.Y.S. 1131, 94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 617, 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newins-v-rose-nysupct-1895.