Newin Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Newin Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

95 A.D.2d 721, 464 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18618

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 23, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 95 A.D.2d 721 (Newin Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Newin Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 95 A.D.2d 721, 464 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18618 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— On remittitur from the Court of Appeals (58 NY2d 645, 646), ruling that plaintiffs had an appeal to this court as of right (CPLR 5701, subd [a], par 2, els [iv], [v]) and that this court had erred in dismissing the appeal as “ ‘nonappealable’ ” and directing consideration of the application on the merits, order, Supreme Court, New York County (Norman C. Ryp, J.), entered July 24, 1981 which (1) granted defendant Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company partial summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action of the second amended complaint, and (2) granted Insurance Company of North America partial summary judgment dismissing the second cause of action of the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Newin Corp. v Continental Ins. Co. (80 AD2d 756, mots for lv to opp dsmd 53 NY2d 606, 938; see, also, Newin Corp. v Hartford Acc. & Ind. Co., 55 NY2d 744). Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Bloom, Fein and Milonas, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— On remittitur from the Court of Appeals (58 NY2d 645, 646), ruling that plaintiffs had an appeal to this court as of right (CPLR 5701, subd [a], par 2, els [iv], [v]) and that this court had erred in dismissing the appeal as “ ‘nonappealable’ ” and directing consideration of the application on the merits, order, Supreme Court, New York County (Norman C. Ryp, J.), entered July 24, 1981 which (1) granted defendant Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company partial summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action of the second amended complaint, and (2) granted Insurance Company of North America partial summary judgment dismissing the second cause of action of the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Newin Corp. v Continental Ins. Co. (80 AD2d 756, mots for lv to opp dsmd 53 NY2d 606, 938; see, also, Newin Corp. v Hartford Acc. & Ind. Co., 55 NY2d 744). Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Bloom, Fein and Milonas, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 A.D.2d 721, 464 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newin-corp-v-hartford-accident-indemnity-co-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack