Newick v. Eastham

112 A. 395, 80 N.H. 11, 1921 N.H. LEXIS 3
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided January 4, 1921·Published

Opinion

Plummer, J.

The issue submitted to the jury was the fair rental value of the premises occupied for the time involved. All the evidence excepted to by the defendants had some tendency to show the value of the use and occupation of the plaintiff’s premises, and was, therefore, competent upon that issue. “Evidence having any tendency, however slight, to prove a particular fact, is competent to be submitted to the jury to show that fact.” Eaton v. Welton, 32 N. H. 352; Tucker v. Peaslee, 36 N. H. 167, 179; 10 R. C. L. 928; Wright v. Woodward, 79 N. H. 474.

Exceptions overruled.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newick v. Eastham, 112 A. 395, 80 N.H. 11, 1921 N.H. LEXIS 3 (N.H. 1921).

112 A. 395 (Newick v. Eastham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wright v. Woodward
111 A. 494 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1920)