Newick v. Eastham

112 A. 395, 80 N.H. 11, 1921 N.H. LEXIS 3
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJanuary 4, 1921
StatusPublished

This text of 112 A. 395 (Newick v. Eastham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Newick v. Eastham, 112 A. 395, 80 N.H. 11, 1921 N.H. LEXIS 3 (N.H. 1921).

Opinion

Plummer, J.

The issue submitted to the jury was the fair rental value of the premises occupied for the time involved. All the evidence excepted to by the defendants had some tendency to show the value of the use and occupation of the plaintiff’s premises, and was, therefore, competent upon that issue. “Evidence having any tendency, however slight, to prove a particular fact, is competent to be submitted to the jury to show that fact.” Eaton v. Welton, 32 N. H. 352; Tucker v. Peaslee, 36 N. H. 167, 179; 10 R. C. L. 928; Wright v. Woodward, 79 N. H. 474.

Exceptions overruled.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. Woodward
111 A. 494 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 A. 395, 80 N.H. 11, 1921 N.H. LEXIS 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newick-v-eastham-nh-1921.