Newick v. Eastham
This text of 112 A. 395 (Newick v. Eastham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The issue submitted to the jury was the fair rental value of the premises occupied for the time involved. All the evidence excepted to by the defendants had some tendency to show the value of the use and occupation of the plaintiff’s premises, and was, therefore, competent upon that issue. “Evidence having any tendency, however slight, to prove a particular fact, is competent to be submitted to the jury to show that fact.” Eaton v. Welton, 32 N. H. 352; Tucker v. Peaslee, 36 N. H. 167, 179; 10 R. C. L. 928; Wright v. Woodward, 79 N. H. 474.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 A. 395, 80 N.H. 11, 1921 N.H. LEXIS 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newick-v-eastham-nh-1921.