Newhall v. Provost
6 Cal. 85
Opinion
Mr. Justice Terry concurred.
It is unnecessary in this case to consider whether a sheriff’s return in one action can be impeached in another suit by a stranger to the first action. It is very certain that the sheriff had no right after making a return to amend it so as to affect rights which had already vested.
The ease must go back, and the first return of the sheriff must be taken as conclusive as against Schloss and Goldstein, as far as regards the rights of the plaintiffs.
Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Newhall v. Provost, 6 Cal. 85 (Cal. 1856).
6 Cal. 85 (Newhall v. Provost) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Farmers Bank & Trust Co. v. Stanley
228 S.W. 691 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1921)
Renick v. Ludington
20 W. Va. 511 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1882)
Chicago Planing Mill Co. v. Merchants' National Bank
97 Ill. 294 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1881)
Stewart v. Stringer
45 Mo. 113 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1869)