Newgold v. Woodstock Development Corp.

227 N.E.2d 886, 19 N.Y.2d 894, 281 N.Y.S.2d 87, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1536
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 16, 1967
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 227 N.E.2d 886 (Newgold v. Woodstock Development Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Newgold v. Woodstock Development Corp., 227 N.E.2d 886, 19 N.Y.2d 894, 281 N.Y.S.2d 87, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1536 (N.Y. 1967).

Opinion

Order reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to Special Term with directions to grant defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment in accordance with the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division. Question certified answered in the negative.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating and Breitel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Utica Mutual Insurance v. Knox
71 A.D.2d 763 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
227 N.E.2d 886, 19 N.Y.2d 894, 281 N.Y.S.2d 87, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newgold-v-woodstock-development-corp-ny-1967.