Newgard v. Shinseki
This text of Newgard v. Shinseki (Newgard v. Shinseki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 14-7005 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 02/19/2014
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
HOWARD NEWGARD, Claimant-Appellant,
v.
ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee. ______________________
2014-7005 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 12-1334, Chief Judge Bruce E. Kasold. ______________________
ON MOTION ______________________
PER CURIAM. ORDER Howard Newgard moves the court to take judicial notice of certain documents that he states were not before the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”). The Secretary of Veterans Affairs opposes. Case: 14-7005 Document: 15 Page: 2 Filed: 02/19/2014
The record on appeal should only include the papers and exhibits filed in the Veterans Court. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(a). Although the Federal Rules of Evidence author- ize judicial notice of certain documents outside of the record, the court is not persuaded that such action is warranted here. See Fed. R. Evid. 201. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is denied. The appellant’s opening brief, which does not include the documents, is accepted for filing. FOR THE COURT
/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
s26
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Newgard v. Shinseki, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newgard-v-shinseki-cafc-2014.