Newell v. Swiss Reassurance Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Newell v. Swiss Reassurance Co.

210 A.D.2d 83, 620 N.Y.S.2d 950, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12686

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 13, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter B. Tolub, J.), entered on or about November 19, 1993, which, inter alia, granted the motion of defendant Swiss Reassurance Company and the cross motion of defendant Olympia and York Properties for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff failed to offer proof sufficient to rebut defendants’ showing that because of the absence of past criminal acts, the attack on plaintiff on the 16th floor of the premises was not foreseeable (Grignoli v New York City Hous. Auth., 196 AD2d 525). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter B. Tolub, J.), entered on or about November 19, 1993, which, inter alia, granted the motion of defendant Swiss Reassurance Company and the cross motion of defendant Olympia and York Properties for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff failed to offer proof sufficient to rebut defendants’ showing that because of the absence of past criminal acts, the attack on plaintiff on the 16th floor of the premises was not foreseeable (Grignoli v New York City Hous. Auth., 196 AD2d 525). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.

Newell v. Swiss Reassurance Co., 210 A.D.2d 83, 620 N.Y.S.2d 950, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12686 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

210 A.D.2d 83 (Newell v. Swiss Reassurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related