Newell v. State

101 S.W.2d 254, 131 Tex. Crim. 603, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 52
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 27, 1937
DocketNo. 18742
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 101 S.W.2d 254 (Newell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Newell v. State, 101 S.W.2d 254, 131 Tex. Crim. 603, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 52 (Tex. 1937).

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for establishment of a lottery under the name and description of an ace marble machine and the disposition of personal property by means of same; punishment, a fine of $100.00.

There are no bills of exceptions in this record. We regard the facts as sufficient to show the guilt of the accused. We find accompanying the record a motion to dismiss the appeal made, however, only by the attorney for the appellant. We can not grant a motion for dismissal unless same be signed and sworn to by the accused.

The motion to dismiss is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Conners v. State
966 S.W.2d 108 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Hypolite v. State
647 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1983)
Ex Parte Trisler
605 S.W.2d 619 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 S.W.2d 254, 131 Tex. Crim. 603, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newell-v-state-texcrimapp-1937.