Newell v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided January 23, 2026·No. 23-1784V·Unpublished

Opinion

Sn the Guited States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 23-1784V ROBERT NEWELL, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: December 22, 2025

V.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

John Beaulieu, Siri & Glimstad, LLP, New York, NY, for Petitioner. Rochelle Ilana Gillenson, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION’

On October 11, 2023, Robert Newell filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.* (the “Vaccine Act’). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a Table injury - Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”) as a result of the administration of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on October 12, 2022. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed December 22, 2025, at Jf] 1-2, 4. Petitioner further alleges that he received the vaccine in the United States, that he suffered the residual effects of his injury for more than six months, and that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action on his behalf as a result of his injury. Stipulation at J] 3-5; see Petition at ff] 4, 26-27. “Respondent denies that [P]etitioner sustained a GBS Table injury; denies that the flu vaccine caused in fact or significantly aggravated [Petitioner's alleged GBS; and denies that the flu vaccine caused [P]etitioner any other injury or [P]etitioner’s current condition.” Stipulation at J 6.

’ Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https:/Awww.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, | agree that the identified material fits within this definition, | will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Nevertheless, on December 22, 2025, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation,* stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. | find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, | award the following compensation:

A lump sum of $120,000.00, to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner. Stipulation at J 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). /d.

| approve the requested amount for Petitioner's compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.4

IT 1S SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 The “Dropbox Sign” “Audit trail” form attached to the parties’ Stipulation at page 7 is omitted from the attached copy of the parties’ Stipulation.

* Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

ROBERT NEWELL,

Petitioner, No. 23-1 784V

Chief Special Master Corcoran

v. ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Robert Newell (“petitioner”) filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 (the “Vaccine Program”). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner’s receipt of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R, § 100.3(a)

2. Petitioner received a flu vaccine on October 12, 2022.!

3, The vaccine was administered within the United States.

' On October 12, 2022, petitioner also received a COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccines against COVID- 19 are not contained in the Vaccine Injury Table. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-14 and 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a). Pursuant to the declaration issued by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (42 U.S.C. §§ 247d-6d, 247d-6e), claims for alleged injuries from COVID-19 countermeasures, including vaccines. may be

compensable under the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (“CICP”). See 85 Fed. Reg. 15198, 15202 (March 17, 2020).

Doc ID: 21861d2589d21cba266816che6a784afa00ISbat 4. Petitioner alleges that he developed Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”) within the time period set forth in the Table. Petitioner further alleges that he suffered the residual effects of the alleged injury for more than six months.

5, Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on petitioner's behalf as a result of the alleged injury.

6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a GBS Table injury; denies that the flu vaccine caused in fact or significantly aggravated petitioner's alleged GBS; and denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner any other injury or petitioner’s current condition.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Hurnan Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a):

A lump sum of $120,000.00 to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner.

This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1 5(a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newell v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2026).

Newell v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Newell v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a
§ 3501
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 247d
42 U.S.C. § 247d
§ 1396
42 U.S.C. § 1396