Home/Fifth Circuit/Newell v. Oxford Management, Inc.

Newell v. Oxford Management, Inc.

918 F.2d 484, 1990 WL 178888
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 20, 1990·No. No. 90-3017·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before KING, GARWOOD and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing filed in the above entitled and [485] numbered cause be and the same is hereby denied. Appellants did not, prior to their petition for rehearing, adequately raise in this Court the claim that the judgment below against them was improper because the notes were invalid or were not due and payable or were not so in an amount sufficient to support the judgment. See, e.g., United Paperworkers v. Champion International, 908 F.2d 1252, 1253 (5th Cir.1990); Villanueva v. CNA Insurance, 868 F.2d 684, 687 n. 5 (5th Cir.1989).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newell v. Oxford Management, Inc., 918 F.2d 484, 1990 WL 178888 (5th Cir. 1990).

918 F.2d 484 (Newell v. Oxford Management, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Glenn Newell v. Oxford Management, Inc., Julius L. Levy, Jr. & Glenn Newell, Plaintiffs-Cross v. Fslic as Receiver for Northlake Federal Savings & Loan Association, Intervenor-Cross-Claimant-Appellee. Fslic, Receiver A/K/A Northlake Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Raymond F. Kidd, Jr., William C. Terral
918 F.2d 484 (Fifth Circuit, 1990)