Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/Newell v. . Newell

Newell v. . Newell

162 S.E. 605, 202 N.C. 255, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 477
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 17, 1932
StatusPublished

This text of 162 S.E. 605 (Newell v. . Newell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Newell v. . Newell, 162 S.E. 605, 202 N.C. 255, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 477 (N.C. 1932).

Opinion

Civil action for divorce a mensa et thoro, and for alimony pendente lite C. S., 1666.

From an order continuing plaintiff's motion for alimony to the hearing , without prejudice to either party, the plaintiff appeals, assigning errors. Conceding, without deciding, that it was error to continue to the hearing plaintiff's motion for alimony pendente lite,, nevertheless, in the absence of a sufficient showing, which perhaps may yet be made, the refusal to allow the motion is not cause for appellate interference. Hennis v.Hennis, 180 N.C. 606, 105 S.E. 274; Easely v. Easely, 173 N.C. 530,92 S.E. 353.

Affirmed. *Page 256

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Easeley v. . Easeley
92 S.E. 353 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1917)
Hennis v. . Hennis
105 S.E. 274 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 S.E. 605, 202 N.C. 255, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newell-v-newell-nc-1932.