Newell v. Aetna Insurance Co.
122 A. 373, 99 N.J.L. 287, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 208
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, White, Heppenheimbr, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Newell v. Aetna Insurance Co., 122 A. 373, 99 N.J.L. 287, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 208 (N.J. 1923).
122 A. 373 (Newell v. Aetna Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Titus v. West American Ins. Co.
362 A.2d 1236 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)