Newell Universal Mill Co. v. Muxlow

New York Supreme Court

Newell Universal Mill Co. v. Muxlow

2 N.Y.S. 223, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 108

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Newell Universal Mill Co. v. Muxlow. Read the opinion of the Court — 4 N.Y.S. 197 →

New York Supreme Court·Decided June 25, 1888·Published

Opinion

Andrews, J.

The authorities are conflicting,—compare Kilburn v. Lowe, 37 Hun, 237, (costs denied to defendant,) with Ackerman v. De Lude, 36 Hun, 46, Coon v. Diefendorf, 2 How. Pr. (N. S.) 389, (costs offset,)—and in view of the fact that, as against this plaintiff, the defense was without merit, and that it would be great hardship if the plaintiff, after losing its property, should also be saddled with a bill of costs, I have concluded that the plaintiff should have the benefit of the doubt, and that the motion for a retaxation should be denied, without costs. •,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrews, J.

The authorities are conflicting,—compare Kilburn v. Lowe, 37 Hun, 237, (costs denied to defendant,) with Ackerman v. De Lude, 36 Hun, 46, Coon v. Diefendorf, 2 How. Pr. (N. S.) 389, (costs offset,)—and in view of the fact that, as against this plaintiff, the defense was without merit, and that it would be great hardship if the plaintiff, after losing its property, should also be saddled with a bill of costs, I have concluded that the plaintiff should have the benefit of the doubt, and that the motion for a retaxation should be denied, without costs. •,

Newell Universal Mill Co. v. Muxlow, 2 N.Y.S. 223, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 108 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1888).

Pincite

2 N.Y.S. 223 (Newell Universal Mill Co. v. Muxlow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.