Newcomer v. Perril
This text of 83 Ind. 600 (Newcomer v. Perril) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is impossible to understand or decide the questions involved in this cause without an examination of the entire evidence, and it is well settled that in such a case the appeal will be unavailing unless: all the evidence is in the record. Johnson v. Wiley, 74 Ind. 233; Wells v. Wells, 71 Ind. 509.
It is quite as well settled that where time is given for the filing of a bill of exceptions, the record must affirmatively show that the bill was filed, within the time prescribed. Singer, etc., Co. v. Struckman, 72 Ind. 601; Dunn v. Hubble, 81 Ind. 489.
It must appear from the record, independently of the recital in the bill itself, that it was filed within the time designated by the court. Stivers v. McConnell, 39 Ind. 240.
In this case it is not even shown that any bill of exceptions was ever filed, much less that it was filed in time.
J udgment- affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
83 Ind. 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newcomer-v-perril-ind-1882.