Newcombe v. Cohn

33 Misc. 602, 67 N.Y.S. 930
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 Misc. 602 (Newcombe v. Cohn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Newcombe v. Cohn, 33 Misc. 602, 67 N.Y.S. 930 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is clear that the defendant Cohn was a nonresident of this State when he was served with the summons. Section 1298 of the Mew York City Consolidation Act (L. 1882, ch. 410) requires that when the defendant or either of several defendants in a Municipal Court is not a resident of the city, the summons must he returnable in not less than two nor more than four days from its date. The summons in this case did not comply with this requirement, being returnable ten days after its date. Under such a summons the Municipal Court never acquired jurisdiction to award any judgment against the defendants. Williams v. Wheeler, 8 Abb. Pr. 116; Allison v. Snider Preserve Co., 20 Misc. Rep. 367.

The judgment appealed from must be reversed, with costs.

Present: Tbuax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment reversed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barth v. Owens
178 Misc. 628 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Misc. 602, 67 N.Y.S. 930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newcombe-v-cohn-nyappterm-1901.