Newcomb v. Walton

41 Tex. 318
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1874·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Roberts, Chief Justice.

This is a suit on a note with an assignment indorsed upon it, and both of which are set out in the petition. The note being drawn in the ordinary form, concluded with the words, “ this note bearing interest from date.”

The only objection made to the judgment in favor of the plaintiff below for the'principal of the note sued on, with eight per cent, interest from the date of the note, is that the verdict is too uncertain to support the judgment.

The verdict is as follows, to wit: “We, the jury, find for the plaintiff, with eight per cent, interest on the note from date.”

[319]*319By reference to the petition, whatever ambiguity there may be in this verdict may be rendered perfectly certain, and on that ground it is sufficient. (Parker v. Leman, 10 Tex., 116, 119; Wells v. Barnett, 7 Tex., 586.)

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newcomb v. Walton, 41 Tex. 318 (Tex. 1874).

41 Tex. 318 (Newcomb v. Walton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rogers v. Bryan
270 S.W. 1066 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Lopez v. Garcia
221 S.W. 665 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1920)
Wolf v. Lane
166 S.W. 72 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1914)
Samples v. Wever
121 S.W. 1129 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1909)
Rushing v. Lanier
111 S.W. 1189 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1908)
Alamo Fire Insurance Co. v. Lancaster
28 S.W. 123 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1894)
Dodd v. Gaines
18 S.W. 618 (Texas Supreme Court, 1891)