Newcomb v. Leslie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Newcomb v. Leslie

300 A.D.2d 92, 751 N.Y.S.2d 462, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12184

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 12, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 300 A.D.2d 92 (Newcomb v. Leslie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Newcomb v. Leslie, 300 A.D.2d 92, 751 N.Y.S.2d 462, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12184 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Paul Victor, J.), entered on or about April 10, 2002, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Although defendants established a prima facie case that plaintiff Mark Newcomb did not suffer a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) by their submission of the affirmed reports of an examining orthopedic surgeon and neurologist, plaintiffs raised an issue of fact by their submission of an MRI report indicating a herniated disc and the report of plaintiff’s treating physician providing objective test results [93]*93to substantiate plaintiffs subjective complaints of pain (see Noble v Ackerman, 252 AD2d 392; see also Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345). Concur — Williams, P.J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Buckley and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Paul Victor, J.), entered on or about April 10, 2002, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Although defendants established a prima facie case that plaintiff Mark Newcomb did not suffer a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) by their submission of the affirmed reports of an examining orthopedic surgeon and neurologist, plaintiffs raised an issue of fact by their submission of an MRI report indicating a herniated disc and the report of plaintiff’s treating physician providing objective test results [93]*93to substantiate plaintiffs subjective complaints of pain (see Noble v Ackerman, 252 AD2d 392; see also Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345). Concur — Williams, P.J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Buckley and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

300 A.D.2d 92, 751 N.Y.S.2d 462, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newcomb-v-leslie-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack