Newcomb v. . La Roe
113 N.E. 1061, 218 N.Y. 682, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1183
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Collin, Ouddeback, Hogan, Seabury and Pound, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Newcomb v. . La Roe, 113 N.E. 1061, 218 N.Y. 682, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1183 (N.Y. 1916).
113 N.E. 1061 (Newcomb v. . La Roe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of Revson
86 A.D.2d 872 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
In re Blanch
126 Misc. 421 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1926)