Newcomb v. Fitzpatrick
This text of 154 A.D.2d 888 (Newcomb v. Fitzpatrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court correctly determined that the nominating petitions of appellant Hull were invalid upon the ground that the subscribing witnesses failed to indicate the assembly district of their residence (Election Law § 6-132 [2]; Matter of Higby v Mahoney, 48 NY2d 15).
We have reviewed the other issues raised on appeal and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Yates County, Purple, J. — Election Law.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ. (Order entered Aug. 24, 1989.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
154 A.D.2d 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newcomb-v-fitzpatrick-nyappdiv-1989.