Newcomb v. Fitzpatrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Newcomb v. Fitzpatrick

154 A.D.2d 888

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 6, 1989·Published

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court correctly determined that the nominating petitions of appellant Hull were invalid upon the ground that the subscribing witnesses failed to indicate the assembly district of their residence (Election Law § 6-132 [2]; Matter of Higby v Mahoney, 48 NY2d 15).

We have reviewed the other issues raised on appeal and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Yates County, Purple, J. — Election Law.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ. (Order entered Aug. 24, 1989.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court correctly determined that the nominating petitions of appellant Hull were invalid upon the ground that the subscribing witnesses failed to indicate the assembly district of their residence (Election Law § 6-132 [2]; Matter of Higby v Mahoney, 48 NY2d 15).

We have reviewed the other issues raised on appeal and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Yates County, Purple, J. — Election Law.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ. (Order entered Aug. 24, 1989.)

Newcomb v. Fitzpatrick, 154 A.D.2d 888 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

154 A.D.2d 888 (Newcomb v. Fitzpatrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related